Bookmarks is where all my open tabs go to die and never be remembered again.

Wow, these are some wild numbers, and very damning for Tesla’s “quality” in particular.

Actually, the way I understand it, he won’t be getting it if things continue to go south for Tesla.

Goals for Musk over the next decade include the company’s delivering 20 million vehicles, having 1 million robotaxis in operation, selling 1 million robots and earning as much as $400 billion in core profit. But in order for him to get paid, Tesla’s stock value has to rise in tandem, first to $2 trillion from the current $1.5 trillion, and all the way to $8.5 trillion.

Achieving each step - an operational goal and a valuation milestone - awards Musk 1% of stock. So the plan could still hand Musk tens of billions of dollars even if he falls short of most of its ambitious targets.

If Musk hits all of them, he would be eligible for 12% in stock, or about $1 trillion.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/tesla-shareholders-approve-878-billion-pay-plan-elon-musk-2025-11-06/

It’s not a completely dumb plan by the investors to keep him focused on the company, but certainly is bonkers renumeration and wild direction.

Personally, I think their investments will be safer with him waaay away from Tesla, rather than concocting hail-mary schemes to drive an already severely inflated stock to even more inflated valuations.

But hey, I don’t invest in shares, so what do I know, and what do I care about theze bozos.

Shit’s on fire, yo

I’d more like put color e-ink into that category - as gimicky and half-baked technology building on a more established one (e-ink is doing quite well with readers, low-power displays, etc.)

Sorry to be pedantic, but wouldn’t this be the correct line:

cat mum (making faces): that means 6 7 is the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything!

42 is the answer

This yacht is many things, one of them being a floating lab. It’s not like it isn’t a super-luxury yacht for $500 million, also. Or like he hasn’t a couple more super-yachts.

I mean, good for the man, good that he’s doing marine conservation on the side, or that he actually cares about his companies, employees, etc. But also, wow, what kind of amounts do billionaires spend on playthings, and what you could do with such money for the betterment of society.

Depends on your needs, really.

Disco Elysium. I haven’t played the Final Cut version, but I’ve kept consuming DE related media and fanart. I know why I’ve been postponing it - lack of free time, and hesitation to re-thread your trip toward something special, and maybe realize it’s a bit more trivialized to you now, or just doesn’t have the same impact, and you’ve wasted a good 30-40 hours for getting the same lessons and experiences you already had.

Yet, I’ll gladly waste 30-40 hours thinking over it. I’m weird.

I’m leaning more and more towards this.

The other week, a guy in a fantasy football rage thread had a similar take, and put it so good I had to screenshot and save it.

I’ve found some, but they’re mostly obscure and older out-of-support stuff. But anecdotally something like less than 5% of my library didn’t work with it.

Or quality.

Bruh, my whole mid-to-high range gaming PC costs 850 to 2K euro. What is the intended use of such an expensive RAM kit? Is it LLMs again?

He’s a friend of Monty’s.

It’s actually the only one of his movies that I somewhat regularly come back to think about. Not to slag his more serious or funnier movies, but something with the remote fast-forward analogy, and how often I wish I could skip or speed over a real-life situation- it really hit close to home, especially the illustrated consequences of that.

As many as 1,500 “ideological immigrants,” … have applied for temporary residence in Russia in the last year.

This is a hilariously small number for a big country, why are they even touting this?

If you’re sitting the average 2.5 meters away from a 44-inch set, a simple Quad HD (QHD) display already packs more detail than your eye can possibly distinguish. The scientists made it crystal clear: once your setup hits that threshold, any further increase in pixel count, like moving from 4K to an 8K model of the same size and distance, hits the law of diminishing returns because your eye simply can’t detect the added detail.

I commend them on their study of human eye “pixels-per-degree” perception resolution limit, but there are some caveats to the article title and their findings.

First of all, nobody recommends a 44-inch TV for 2.5 metres, I watch from the same distance and I think the minimum recommended 4k TV size for that distance was 55 inches.

Second, I’m not sure many QHD TVs are being offered, market mostly offers 4k or 1080p TVs, QHDs would be a small percentage.

And QHDs are already pretty noticable quality jump over 1080p, I’ve noticed on my gaming rig. So basically if you do the jump from 1080p to 4K, and watch 4k quality content, from the right distance - most people are absolutely gonna notice that quality difference.

For 8Ks I don’t know, you probably do get into diminishing returns there unless you have a wall-sized TV or watch it from very close.

But yeah, clickbaity titled article, mostly.

Doesn’t getting an API key defeat the purpose of “no tracking”? Genuinely asking, don’t know much about this, but intuition points me they will be able to track you by API key used then.

It do be like that.

I meant the more human-centric origin myths, e.g. like the Romans believing they were totally the decendants of Aeneas and the Trojans fleeing Troy’s destruction.