To a billion parameter matrix inverter? Probably not too hard, maybe not at those speeds.

To a GPU, or even just the functions used in GenAI? We don’t even know if those are possible with analog computers to begin with.

But it only does 16x16 matrix inversion.

That happens but you should look this guy up

Will they pay for it though? The real cost of it, I mean.

“Survival of the fittest” is about a species, not an individual. For larger animals pain and pleasure are the greatest teachers, because we can learn from those. These species benefit from individuals learning survival skills. Insects have no use for it, they don’t learn to adapt, they survive through numbers, their behavior adapts through evolution.

They react to damage the same way plants do. If you want to call that pain, sure. It doesn’t make sense evolutionary that they would suffer from it though.

And we know it’s not inherent to life. Even some people are born without nociceptors because of genetic issues. Not-suffering is a big problem, kids get infections etc because they don’t learn to stop hurting themselves.

Nature is very cruel, but not so evil to evolve suffering in animals who don’t have the capacity to learn from it.

Trump would support her because he can win from her easily.

Great time for the US to try 3 or 4 parties

By convincing CEOs to replace their workforce with AI?

Corporate VPNs generally don’t route www traffic, keeping that separate is kind of the point.

So unless you can convince your job to provide you porn, you’re out of luck.

Disks or partitions?

Maybe be brown? Seems like an easy way to get in trouble nowadays.

Innovation funds in EU projects mostly get used for valuable things the companies wanted to do anyways. Give it an AI spin, build the thing, see if the spin has added value and if not just drop it and keep the core thing.

We’re using AI funds to build a thing that happens to use a vector db and xgboost. Not genAI at all but it’ll work and you can phrase it as AI so the paper people are happy.

It’s kind of besides the point. Yes they don’t add anything unique and yes it was most likely because if hype, but NFTs is just what they used in the wip to store the signatures on, but the core principle is flawed no matter what you put it on.

Sorry I thought you suggested DNS to solve the core issues.

A digital signature works with public/private keys and content hashes. This is a solved problem.

In fact, it’s part of secure DNS.

What would that solve? NFTs don’t have to be powerhungry proof of work, that was just for the monkeys. The public ledger part of this is not the problem.

How would that work? Why would you have any reason to trust me in this chain?

then you know for sure that CNN released it.

Why not link to the original CNN source then, if you want to be trusted? You’d have to do that anyways if you want to use the CNN footage in your own video.

I don’t think people who care about the validity of a news video will be helped much with this, and people who don’t care about the truth can easily ignore it too.

As a news organisation they should have their own due diligence about sources etc

But what if they can’t anymore? News orgs don’t only show video that they recorded. They have videos from freelance reporters, people who were at an event, government orgs, other news orgs in other countries…

It’s the paperclip maximizer in action.

Sign every video automatically? Sounds like chatcontrol all over.

Also, I could just generate a video on my computer and film it with my phone. Now it’s signed, even has phone artifacts for added realism.