The time, for tofu scramble? It’s literally quicker cheaper and much healthier than doing it with eggs???

Same thing with egg salad, etc. few packs of silken tofu in a Tupperware with black salt, butter, etc.

You do not need to worry about protein at all. It’s impossible to design an amino acid deficient diet with enough calories.

B12 requirements and recycling also drop in vegans and there’s no evidence lower levels lead to negative outcomes.

No. The definition is clear. I didn’t mention good or bad.

I said vegetarians are carnists and support the dominion over animals. Which they do clearly with their actions.

You made the claim halfwit. I responded to you. Crying about being called out won’t change that.

lol, no source then. Just talking mince? You were the one that made the original claim, not be. Burden of proof is on you, coward.

I’m not the one that made the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.

Plenty of studies and evidence in this thread alone that show you’re wrong.

If you found out your partner was a rapist or murderer would you judge them and want them to stop ? What’s the difference here other than the victim?

Vegan is an ethical stance. Every vegan is vegan for ethical reasons or they aren’t vegan. You’re thinking of a plant based diet.

Not really it’d be like eating grandma when you can just go buy something else. Organ donation saves lives and is essential, eating flesh is not.

I mean it was like one sentence hardly challenging? I’ve been vegan for over a decade and been round most of the west, where doesn’t have a ton of plant milks? The only struggle is out of comfort.

Just going veggie and cutting out a major source of your nutrients without considering a replacement is far more dangerous than simply switching to readily available vegan alternatives.

Just the ones that jump into threads about vegans and perpetuate their pish.

Yes they do. Otherwise they’d realise it’s not theirs to take and not partake.

What issues?

Vegan milks, meats, etc are fortified with everything hard to get and most macro levels are naive and based on studies performed on the general population/omnivores. It’s actually harder as a vegetarian as you don’t get the metabolic pathway benefits like the improved omega6 conversion. This is why you don’t get actual negative outcomes shown for low levels of certain nutrients in vegans.

It’s effortless unless you’ve got a selective eating disorder. Just chuck some flax and nooch in sauces and you’re good to go.

Well, vegans have 25% lower risk of CVD and 20% lower incidence of cancer so not being vegan would harm them long term. But not really about that, I take issue how you’re framing this as a personal choice. Think you’re forgetting about someone.

Contributing to animal suffering is a choice I hope they never make just like any other violent act. Just like they won’t be sat down at puberty and told they’re now old enough to decide if they want to rape or not, exploiting animals won’t be presented as a neutral choice either.

Source?

Apologies. Meant there is no risk from avoiding animal products.

deleted by creator

No, it’s not. It can be for vegans. But just not eating meat (aka vegetarian) has no malnutrition risk.

No, it’s not. There is no malnutrition risk from avoiding meat.

HAHAHA, jesus dude. No, all of that is wrong.

Malnutrition is not a risk, vegan’s have less deficiencies on average.

Vegans grow up stronger, taller, and healthier.

Carnists imposing their beliefs on kids and making them eat animals causes tangible negative health outcomes, accelerates the destruction of our planet, is and is ethically vile.

I’m sorry, what? Do vegetarians not see themselves as having dominion over animals to do with what they please?

Carnism is a concept used in discussions of humanity’s relation to other animals, defined as a prevailing ideology in which people support the use and consumption of animal products