[Stocks are] really not that important in the overall context of things, but I have some money invested, so that 's good for me, I guess." -NC Hispanic man

People voted for Trump because we thought we were going to get lower costs of living, to some degree at least, and everything has just increased in price. -GA Black man

So I have an EBT card, and it’s a lot harder to prove certain things in order to qualify for that. So just little things like that, they all add up, and I think they need to focus on us more than other countries. -MI white man

At first him speaking his mind was refreshing and I saw him getting a lot accomplished, but then it just got mean and nasty and very unbecoming. And it just made me cringe and I just didn’t like him anymore. -AZ white woman

Deportations were a thing he was talking about, just not to the extreme. I would say yes, I was surprised. -MI Black man

I thought the focus was going to be more on securing the border, focused on hardened criminals, not so much everyday folk. -MI white man

I think the ICE has a place in this country right now because of the influx of illegals, but I also think the ICE officers have not been adequately trained. -ME white woman

All the South Koreans, I believe, that were going to be the instructors and teach Americans how to do that job–we had this whole thing where they refused to come back, and now they’re going to let AI and robots do the majority of jobs. -AZ Hispanic man

And I also feel like I liken it to 1936 Germany with the brown coats [sic]. And so, there has to be a better way to do this - ME white woman

I think he should take care of the US first instead of acquiring other countries. -AZ white woman

I couldn’t believe that I was complicit in deportations and I felt horribly and cried a lot about it and everything. I guess I kind of knew, but refused to pay attention to it because it just seemed ridiculous in my head to think things could really go that way - MI Hispanic woman

joker-amerikkklap

    • EveningCicada [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      An NYT 1922 classic:

      But several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idea that Hitler’s anti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semitic propaganda as a bait to catch masses of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic, and in line for the time when his organization is perfected and sufficiently powerful to be employed effectively for political purposes.

      A sophisticated politician credited Hitler with peculiar political cleverness for laying emphasis and over-emphasis on anti-Semitism, saying: “You can’t expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims. You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them.”

      • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Also in 1922:

        WHY WOULD AUNTIE PHÓ DO THAT? THEY JUST FUCKING SHOT HIM (with a brick fired from their arms to his car window okay nobody was actually hurt but Hitler was just giving a nice speech). SO MUCH FOR THE TOLERANT LEFT!

        The left in 1922:

        Yeah we just read this guy’s book and think nazis are bad.

  • laranis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    5 days ago

    I wish I could be as ignorant as these people. Seriously, how far detached from the workings of society do you need to be to make some of these statements? Does your entire current events knowledge come from what you heard on a three minute segment of your hometown news broadcast? Does the hardest part of your day consist of whether to lean to the right or to the left as you shit your pants sitting down?

    Must be fucking nice.

      • peeonyou [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        same. i didn’t know it because I haven’t seen any of them in 10 years or more but my mom came to visit a few months back and was telling me all about it.

        she shockingly isn’t one of them, even though she’s basically an evangelical christian.

  • regul [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    5 days ago

    The guy with the EBT card not realizing it’s harder to use EBT because they’ve been focusing on domestic policy. Like he thinks EBT just started having a bunch of extra requirements because it wasn’t getting any attention.

    Real intellectual titans.

      • The_hypnic_jerk [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s not just curiosity, plenty of people are curious. It requires you to be confrontational with authority. “That’s just how it is” is obviously not something that set well with any one of us here, but given different life circumstances you could be plenty curious of lots of things and never been confronted with any major contradictions that required you to question authority.

    • TheBroodian [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      While that’s true, even before looking at political positions, there are just so many Americans that don’t have even a fragment of empathy or care for human life (let alone any other form of life). It’s a nation of misanthropes.

    • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      It took a certain set of material conditions which drove us to care for things outside of ourselves. It is a different set for everyone to some degree, but these people are purely self interested and that will not change with access or exposure to “political knowledge.” It won’t be until some tragedy or existential experience personally impacts them that they begin on a path that will allow them to grow politically. This is precisely why no revolution will happen in the imperial core

  • MarxMadness [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It should be clearer now than ever before that the Democratic strategy of reaching across the aisle is useless. You can’t reason with these people because they didn’t reason themselves into their positions to begin with. There’s nothing you could do for these people or say to them that won’t be outweighed by ten types of brain-poisoned propaganda within a week. If any of them change their politics it will be due to some inscrutable internal calculus, not anything you could reveal in a focus group and target.

    Articles like this and the obvious futulity of this approach could be a good radicalization talking point for libs. Goes hand-in-hand with “why aren’t Democrats running on any of the stuff that’s popular with their own constituents?”

    • immuredanchorite [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 days ago

      But the Democratic Party (the politicians and the rich faction of people they actually represent) don’t actually want any of those things to happen. They would rather lose than do the right thing. Being in the opposition is easy for them, because the Republicans can do all of these things they don’t disagree with ideologically (but their voters do) and they can feign resistance in order to capture more PAC money. Their strategy is working: they will promise nothing and expect your vote regardless. If they win they will suddenly not have the power to reverse any changes fundamentally. If they lose they will throw up their hands and wait another few years to promise nothing and expect you to like it. They have been doing the same thing for decades and people still think that things will change

    • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      Absolutely. This should prove–prove–that the American electorate is not voting based on policy. American elections, especially at the national level, are purely vibes based. The Democrats’ sweaty triangulation and technocratic wonk proposals will never win them elections, because their vibes are rancidly bad and that is all that matters. Nobody is paying attention to your policies. Most people don’t know what your policies are or even have policy preferences themselves.

      • sexywheat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        is not voting based on policy

        I mean, if the democrats (or anyone, who cares) campaigned on something like a national rent freeze, or increasing the minimum wage, or medicare-for-all, or any other easy-to-understand policy that would benefit the overwhelming majority of American workers, then they just might. Instead it’s all inscrutable bureaucratic tax credits and wonk shit.

  • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    At first him speaking his mind was refreshing and I saw him getting a lot accomplished, but then it just got mean and nasty and very unbecoming. And it just made me cringe and I just didn’t like him anymore. -AZ white woman

    Super alien concept to me to just be like: “i liked [leader’s] personality without really giving a shit about what they were actually doing to people and the country. But now they’re cringe so my political ideology, to the extent that it existed, has done a 180.”

  • cricbuzz [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 days ago

    All the South Koreans, I believe, that were going to be the instructors and teach Americans how to do that job–we had this whole thing where they refused to come back, and now they’re going to let AI and robots do the majority of jobs. -AZ Hispanic man

    Literally reads like it’s coming from meemaw

    Also, amazing how the conservative mind holds onto things that the rest of us let go, and lets go of things the rest of us know are important