Image is sourced from this article depicting the 28th ASEAN Plus Three Summit, which took place at the same time as the 47th ASEAN Summit.
Last week concluded the 47th summit of ASEAN in Malaysia as well as a swathe of concurrent summits surrounding ASEAN. For those unfamiliar, formally, China is not a member of ASEAN, but is part of the ASEAN Plus Three (as part of the “Three”, alongside Japan and Occupied Southern Korea). And while not really ASEAN, there is also a yet wider organization, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which tacks on Australia and New Zealand to the group of countries that are currently in ASEAN (which is the single largest trade bloc on the planet). At the summit, Timor-Leste was officially introduced into ASEAN, making it the 11th country to do and the first since Cambodia in 1999.
Many important figures throughout Asia, as well as Trump, Ramaphosa, and Lula, attended the event. As you can imagine, Trump’s appearance was not exactly positive - signing four rather coerced bilateral deals there, including with Malaysia, which forced those countries to buy American goods in exchange for certain exemptions from Trump’s high tariff regime. The US is currently in a bit of a panic due to China restricting access to rare earths, a critical component of many weapons technologies (and electronics in general) and is looking around for countries to help supply them. After the summit, the US and China signed a deal related to tariffs and rare earths, but it seems very unlikely that this is the end of the saga; the US politically, economically, and militarily cannot tolerate China’s existence as a sovereign actor and will try to overcome them until the American Empire topples.
Meanwhile, China did as they ordinarily do, and urged higher regional integration and trade without high tariffs, as well as adherence to the Global Governance Initiative (which, as we here never tire of noting, is an interesting thing to try and encourage while the US only more feverishly violates the sovereignty of nations everywhere). One hopes they’re supplying a bit more than just speeches to Venezuela, Cuba, and beyond, as the US prepares to start bombing.
Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.
Please check out the RedAtlas!
The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.
The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


On Trump’s talks about nuclear testing, and the USA seeking to resume nuclear testing on a like for like basis with Russia and China:
Believe it or not, this doesn’t come solely from Trump. The State Department and Defence Intelligence Agency in the USA have indirectly accused China, and directly accused Russia, of carrying out covert supercritical nuclear tests that produce yield in violation of the CTBT for years.
The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) which is signed but not ratified in 1996 by all three nations (USA - Russia - China), has the following obligations:
However the CTBT still allows for tests that produce zero yield/no explosion, known as subcritical tests. The US has carried out such tests since 1996 and publicised them, the last in 2020. However Russia revoked it’s ratification of the CTBT according to Putin, in November of 2023. In April of 2020 the US State Department made the following allegations in its annual compliance report, direct PDF link to US government website towards Russia and China, in the context of violating the CTBT:
RUSSIAN FEDERATION (RUSSIA) FINDING:
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (CHINA) FINDING
This would explain comments by Trump that Russia and China are testing nuclear weapons. He’s receiving intelligence reports that say so. Parts of these reports are public, such as the ones quoted above. Covert low yield (but not zero yield) underground tests that evade monitoring for the CTBT. The US, with Trump’s statements, is loudly and publicly accusing Russia and China of violating the CTBT, and saying that they will do so themselves.
If the CTBT is kaput, we go back to the Threshold Test Ban Treaty (TTBT) between Russia and the USA, which allows underground nuclear tests of a yield up to 150kt. However China is the big outlier, they are not part of such bilateral cold war treaties.
this really is a problem with existing arms control systems. so many were set up when it was just USSR vs USA. they don’t reflect geopolitical reality anymore. maybe a new nuclear arms control regime could also provide some accountability for israel as well
Unlikely, they love their “ambiguity” and the US has never (AFAIK) really pushed back on it.
Very true. The INF treaty collapsed in part due to that.
China did ratify the CTBT, so there’s that. But the thing is if that’s gone, what’s holding China back (legally) from atmospheric tests like they did in 1980? Or 600KT underground tests China did in the 90s? Obviously I don’t think or want such to happen, but it absolutely could. It’s also where the US threat of like for like testing comes in.
I suppose the knowledge that Russia and the US would immediately drop other treaties as they’re broken by China is enough to discourage their adherence for now.
Why should Russia abide by a treaty they are no longer a part of? It wasn’t Russia that started to pull out of arms control treaties first, it was the US who did so unilaterally to begin with.
If you ask me Russia and China should do nuclear tests. Full scale, no “subcritical” or low yield pussyfooting. It’s the only way to put the fear of god back into the imperialist lunatics when you have an increasing number of these idiotic Westerners starting to tell each other that’s it’s totally ok to attack Russia directly because their nukes don’t work anymore.