I just searched for chrome vs firefox and just about every article from the past year or so say firefox is more secure. Not that it matters a lot either way. Two party system is crap.
How so? at least on Android and Linux there is a lack of sandboxing and site isolation. This could be fixed up to a certain point but anyways it would be more insecure than chromium.
I also just checked the sandboxing status directly in Firefox.
And I’m kinda of cheating, I knew they used it since I’ve got an unsupported configuration with HW video decoding. It’s caused by their sandbox blocking certain things, and it’s a known issue. Nvidia drivers don’t support VA-API, Firefox only supports VA-API. There’s an adapter library available, but it doesn’t work in Firefox unless you disable the sandbox.
So, there is still the problem with the sandbox and the only way you have hw acceleration is to disable the sandbox, I bet it is elfarto VA API adapter library. And what about FF Android?
Because you’re an adult who’s expected to know how to use a search engine. I used DDG and it took me about 40 seconds to find the source for the claim you’re asking a source for.
The problem with iron fox is that it’s so hardened about privacy that it breaks functionality l, for example you can’t even use add-ons if you don’t enable it first, it is disabled by default…
Objectively more insecure and underperformant than ANY other chromium based browser.
Got a source for that incredible claim?
If you’re going to make wild claims that most people would disagree with, you better be able to back it up with objective facts
deleted by creator
https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.html
I just searched for
chrome vs firefoxand just about every article from the past year or so say firefox is more secure. Not that it matters a lot either way. Two party system is crap.How so? at least on Android and Linux there is a lack of sandboxing and site isolation. This could be fixed up to a certain point but anyways it would be more insecure than chromium.
Firefox uses literally the Chromium sandbox on Linux, they have for years.
https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing
deleted by creator
So there’s a couple of sources, like the (rather outdated) Mozilla wiki page detailing the sandbox support on Linux.
And I know it’s specifically the Chromium sandbox, since they vendor their copy of it.
I also just checked the sandboxing status directly in Firefox.
And I’m kinda of cheating, I knew they used it since I’ve got an unsupported configuration with HW video decoding. It’s caused by their sandbox blocking certain things, and it’s a known issue. Nvidia drivers don’t support VA-API, Firefox only supports VA-API. There’s an adapter library available, but it doesn’t work in Firefox unless you disable the sandbox.
Edit: Oh yeah, Firefox is also affected by the same issue Chrome is, where Flatpak interferes in the sandbox.
deleted by creator
So, there is still the problem with the sandbox and the only way you have hw acceleration is to disable the sandbox, I bet it is elfarto VA API adapter library. And what about FF Android?
Because you’re an adult who’s expected to know how to use a search engine. I used DDG and it took me about 40 seconds to find the source for the claim you’re asking a source for.
Burden of proof is on the claimant. That should always be the expectation, not “Do YoUr OwN ReSeArCh”
deleted by creator
that’s why ironfox is so valuable
The problem with iron fox is that it’s so hardened about privacy that it breaks functionality l, for example you can’t even use add-ons if you don’t enable it first, it is disabled by default…
Waterfox is a better choice in that regard.
I like waterfox but ESR based
Lmao, never have I ever seen a lemmy comment ratio’d this bad
deleted by creator