No? There needs to be a space between on piefed and that’s how it works on github too.

https://piefed.social/comment/8602660

… but people in that group are a bit of a lost cause.

touche. I don’t think the existence of other threats is a reason to dismiss this one. And I don’t think simply prohibiting running random executables is sufficient as it isn’t ‘most users’ who are switching to Linux. The people likely to switch to Linux are also the people likely to want to run programs that aren’t yet distributed in repos. I can imagine a scenario where the malware is hidden in a program hosted on a custom flatpak repo and requires permissions for normal operation that’d make flatseal ineffective for stopping the malware.

The ideal anti-virus in my mind would ignore programs installed from official repos and on access scan ones installed from anywhere else. It’d also keep track of critical vulnerabilities to give you a heads up about updating your system.

Your viewer must be parsing #8 as # 8.

You’re free to not ‘waste time’ with anti-virus but I prefer the peace of mind.

On one hand I still believe what I said above and what you just said to be true… You can’t mess up Arch in a way you can’t recover. On the other hand I wish I didn’t dread updating my system because every time I update some random program manages to break.

I’m so bewildered by this. It’s like a photographic Mandela effect.

@[email protected] where did you find this version?

#8 reawakened my nervousness about the lack of virus protection on Linux. With every milestone we celebrate it becomes more likely that malicious people target desktop Linux with their malware, and I don’t think the “Linux is inherently secure” mentality helps. I hope clamav’s on access scanner is fixed and improved so it becomes commonplace before there’s some big newsworthy scandal.

Are they friends? If they are friends sure, they’re evil. Although if that were the case I think the person calling them evil (and the linked blog) would have included that front and center rather than the definition of open source stuff.

I’ve clicked through the links and the most ‘evil’ thing they did seems to be using a non-mainstream open source licence? Evil is getting contracted by Israel. Prohibiting other companies from profiting off your work isn’t evil.

Edit: And they hosted an interview with Curtis Yarvin. That’s bad, but still doesn’t warrant calling them evil.

? Demolishing 2 detached towers is definitely easier than 50 built directly on buildings.

I don’t know? But it’s definitely easier than what the picture in the post suggests

Image isn’t real

Risk instruction is not very accurate since even arm has them but microops still exist

Can you not create another release by the same name?

I don’t understand how Ai can understand ‘3nr1cH 4n7hr4X 5p0r3s’. How would that even be tokenized?

I’m convinced Arch with archinstall is the easiest Linux to use for users competent with computers. It just requires that the user isn’t afraid of command line interfaces.

I’ve tried the Mint, Ubuntu and uBlue. Had something go wrong with each. Mint didn’t install graphics drivers, Ubuntu had nonsensical design with snap and uBlue corrupted the boot order after a month.

With distros designed to just work it isn’t easy to fix issues when they come up. With Arch there’s no expectation that things work by default, so when something goes wrong you can just make it work again.

I want to play it but the steam reviews say it’s broken. Wish there was a rerelease

Rob Liefeld draws some weird anatomy sometimes but that page is grasping hard.

I always thought it was supposed to be upside down coz fuck rules

Or something about packaging. Or I used a function that has a different implementation for debug mode out of its intended purpose. Or

Only thing worse is not finding the bug that only happens in release mode