Just for the sake of clarity, there is a difference between jumping above 2C during a year and the long-term average being above 2C, which is what we’re usually talking about when it comes to global warming. This headline, and the 1.5C headlines from 2023, tend to muddy the waters. Shit is bad and getting worse, but it’s not quite as bad as you might think at first glance.

Wooooo! We are so back!

Where? Genuinely curious

But then they’d have to drive all the way to Illinois or Minnesota to buy their weed

I didn’t either! ActivityPub came out in 2018, what was Fediverse before ActivityPub?

I would love to! It’s just a pretty conservative workplace, so I’m very worried about the backlash that I’m expecting

They say they’re disbanding because they feel that the issue is now solvable via domestic politics. That seems like a good thing to me

And it is easily extensible to YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss to include the time of day

You’re better off leaving Rumble behind

Ooh, I’m a fan of Aesop Rock and Danny Brown in close proximity 👀 what else you got on there?

I’m not sure I’d call it “adhering to a predetermined script”, but yeah, agreeing that capitalism is bad and should be abolished does indeed sound pretty anarchist to me!

No, words still have meaning. But context matters, and context can have a bearing on meaning. The bar for what counts as “defending capitalism” is going to look different in a community of anarchists compared to a “change my view” type of community.

To be fair, you’re also not in the comments of an anti-pigeon post in an anti-pigeon community

Because they just keep recycling the same tired arguments

“I have no problems with capitalism” sounds pretty defend-y to me

There is someone doing it in this very thread. But yeah, Lemmy is, fortunately, quite left-wing

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

Thank you!

Millions of voters wanted it. They don’t realize that the circle of acceptable in-groups only gets smaller. They’re cheering at the cruelty today, but it won’t take long to catch them too.

Has Mozilla indicated any openness to taking that approach with Firefox?