Obligatory reminder that this comparison is versus vanilla wine, and gamers (steam) haven’t been using vanilla wine for many years.
Versus esync or fsync, ntsync doesn’t bring any particular performance benefit. But it may bring more consistent fps, and is actually supported in the kernel and now wine.
Just don’t expect 100 more fps, or even 10.
I do. I upgrade before the major release goes out of support, so no I don’t get much from it, but I do still get patches from it occasionally. Iirc they released an imagemagick patch before upstream did
Islets is a delightful, short, high quality metroidvania. Highly recommended
I looked in to this a while back and didn’t find anything complete. I ended up using a collector and feeding the reports in to my existing Loki and making my own Grafana dashboard.
I used to. It’s really complicated and not big in the self hosted space.
I’d recommend the standard Prometheus, alert manager, and grafana stack instead. That’s what I use now, and although yaml sure is something, at least there’s tons of people to copy.
(2 weeks ago)
In my non scientific test, this version did increase my FFXIV fps in a CPU bound scenario, in limsa lominsa.
Aur is completely user controlled, it is not official and not trusted. Someone just decided to use those names and upload something.
Saga of the seven Suns
The client has the private key, the server has the corresponding public key in its authorized keys file.
The server is vulnerable to the private key getting stolen from the client.
Use the DNS challenge instead? You’ll need a DNS provider with an API though
It’s comfort food. Never pushing the envelope much, but always high quality.
Note that the first game came out in 1986. These remakes will look great and put some modern conveniences on… But it will still be a game from 1986. If you want a modern DQ then 11 is great.
Source: https://blogs.kde.org/2024/12/21/this-week-in-plasma-end-of-year-bug-fixing/
I’d rather see the original source, not a repost that doesn’t add any substance. Phoronix does some good original work but I don’t think stuff like this where they just add fluff is useful.
You might want to be more specific, cloud flare has a lot of different products, and you’re getting answers with differing assumptions.
For the self hosted focus, I use tail scale already, and when (not if) that company gets shitty, I will switch to head scale, or a competitor, or straight wire guard (plus firewall etc).
But I also run web sites on cf, and there’s no real alternative, definitely not for free. I don’t have hundreds of millions to spend on the CDN part, for starters.