Very fair, I had a lot of fun with it as a casual game to relax with. Not so easy it’s trivial, not so hard it needs a lot of thinking.

obsidian seems to have a maps plugin

This is fine. We don’t need lemmy or the fediverse to take over completely immediately.

It’s a good working prototype that’s not a complete ghost town and that’s good enough for now. It doesn’t need to win everywhere immediately, it’s fine if it’s a working solution we can point to and new communities can be created if some people decide to and they won’t exist in a complete vacuum.

Was ich gerne sehen würde wäre das bekämpfen von 2. Reihe parken, ausliefern auf Radwegen oder Bushaltestellen, etc… Im Zusammenhang damit gerne Parkkontrollen auf den Flächen die eigentlich fürs Ausladen vorgesehen und so beschildert sind.

Und Stadtreinigung, besonders jetzt im Herbst und natürlich im Winter fällt auf das nicht ordentlich geräumt wird. Nicht die nassen Blätte auf denen man ausrutschen kann und auch nicht Schneel und Eis.

Und Obdachlosenhilfe.

Wenn ich keine schlechte Bettelmusik im ÖPNV mehr hören müsste würde ich mich auch nicht beschweren.

Und ggf. einfach normale Wartung von Lampen die eigentlich eh schon da aber halt kaputt sind.

It’s fascinating to think how small the niche I’m in actually is.

Depends on what’s available. Regeneration would probably be it. Wouldn’t say no to something stronger though.

…why do you want to be invisible? Most of the time, you can put on business casual, smile and wave and you will vanish in plain sight. Or a construction helmet and reflective vest and a clipboard.

Of course. You can even use the syntax.

My opinion is that most educational stuff treats kids super super carefully. If you’re a parent or doing 1:1 teaching, you very precisely target which things to do and how to teach them. Like, “don’t go into the deep end of the pool” is for when there isn’t someone paying attention and watching. But you are. You can step in and help. Go have fun in the deep end.

The bigger problem I see, is that for learning to happen, there needs to be genuine interest and a genuinely good project for the kid to do and chances are they can’t do that, because they don’t have any problems that need solving.

You can bridge that by making something up or buying a kit, but ultimately, learning to code is about empowerment to solve your own problems.

You know [Burger chain]? Self hosting is making your own burger. Kinda similar ingredients, kinda looking product overall, it’s still a burger.

But you’re in control.

“It has been suggested that the universe could be simulated. If such a simulation were possible, the simulated universe could itself give rise to life, which in turn might create its own simulation. This recursive possibility makes it seem highly unlikely that our universe is the original one, rather than a simulation nested within another simulation,” says Dr. Faizal. “This idea was once thought to lie beyond the reach of scientific inquiry. However, our recent research has demonstrated that it can, in fact, be scientifically addressed.”

That’s not how you would make such a simulation. Even if it was real, that higher power making a simulation would still have constraints and would both be able to stop the recursion, and probably never let it emerge in the first place.

The research hinges on a fascinating property of reality itself. Modern physics has moved far beyond Newton’s tangible “stuff” bouncing around in space. Einstein’s theory of relativity replaced Newtonian mechanics. Quantum mechanics transformed our understanding again. Today’s cutting-edge theory—quantum gravity—suggests that even space and time aren’t fundamental. They emerge from something deeper: pure information.

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

No.

God is still dead. Theists man…

They used powerful mathematical theorems—including Gödel’s incompleteness theorem—to prove that a complete and consistent description of everything requires what they call “non-algorithmic understanding.”

Extra no.

The theorem isn’t a possible theory. It is fact. What they think they found was already proven to be impossible, theoretically, in any kind of universe. So it’s extra funny that they are talking this openly about it, because it means this isn’t just regular BS, it is ultra mega turbo BS.

Tun sie nicht. Fake News.

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/half-good-new-danish-chat-control-proposal/

Sie verzichten auf die erzwungene Umsetzung von Providern, der neue Vorschlang ist das sie es “freiwillig” machen. Sonst hat sich nichts geändert.

My problem wtih the existing linux phones is that they are usually clearly labled as “experimental beta device + OS, only recommended for experienced users” and for linux, that’s scary to me. I’ve been using it for over 10 years, but as a user, you know?

The big problem with this is that I don’t like android.

It works relatively well, it’s support is ok, it’s probably better than apple because their garden walls are higher. But it’s not at all the operating system I would like to have. It’s already too restrictive, I have not seen/found good app building docs that make it actually easy and convenient to create “apps” and that massively rubs me the wrong way.

With that move, google is enshittfying android, but that doesn’t mean we have to resist the enshittification and keep android, we can also let them do it and move to something else. In theory, anyway.

So I’d like to see more calls for different OS, forks or stuff like

https://www.fsf.org/news/librephone-project

Depends.

Birds aren’t real is fake, but pretty popular, because it’s funny.

Flat earthing is also fake but somehow has a huge following.

Würde ich denen immernoch keinen Strick draus drehen. Die sind jetzt 6 Monate dabei, Strukturen aufzubauen und so einzurichten das man auch die Daten kriegt die man haben will wenn man irgendwo anruft dauert.

Bzw. wenn das so läuft wie ich es aus der sonstigen Arbeit kenne, interessiert sich fast keiner dafür was man will, bis die Kacke mal ordentlich dampft und diese Umstellung ist so ein Fall. Im Idealfall machen sie jetzt die Datensammlung und haben dafür auch die Rückendeckung das das Projekt von oben genug Rückendeckung hat das die Daten auch tatsächlich geliefert werden. Und dann können die sich umschauen wie sie die Lösung machen.

Nope, you just can’t put your finger on what’s distinct now and you lack the contrast of what the future brings.

Hair styles, fashion, design, colors, music, phones and other devices, all of that will be different in 10 years.

Remember, facebook was all the rage in a different era and is now uncool. Same for twitter. That’s era defining as well.

Besides, it’s GTA, it’s not like they’re gonna break much new ground in terms of gameplay mechanics that need to be kept secret.

Why Would You Say Something So Controversial Yet So Brave?

Honestly, I think it’s relatively simple: eeeeveryone and their dog signs an NDA. The people working on it are excited and have to bite their tongue every. single. day. and they are waiting for the release where they can just talk about it.

Then some douche with access leaks it and so all that effort goes to waste, and they still can’t talk about it, because that would make things worse. Also, if someone says something negative, they can’t show the positive and defend their work.

You want some kind of decay function for when that engagement happened.

The rest is sort of up to you and depends on your math intuition a bit. If you do something like total (votes/10.000)+% relative stuff will weigh heavily until you get close to 10.000 then the votes will dominate no matter how positive the post was. But the 10.000 is arbitrary.

My advice would be to create some fake data that are plausible scenarios, (well liked, low vote), (lots of votes, medium %), (lots of votes, but old) and then you experiment with some functions and curves until you find a mix you like.

Das dumme an dieser Art von Entgegnung ist, das man auch einfach etwas gegen zwei (oder mehr) Religionen haben kann. Also, auf tolerante Art.

Das ist mal wieder ein gutes Bespiel für richtig, richtig schlechten Journalismus.

Der Security-Mitarbeiter argumentierte, dass sie gegen das Hausrecht, das eine Nachtruhe vorsieht, verstoßen hätten und rief die Polizei.

WANN ist das ganze passiert?

„stillen und friedlichen Protest aus ihren Zimmern heraus“ geäußert, schreiben Be­woh­ne­r*in­nen des Camps in einem am Montagmittag veröffentlichten Statement auf Deutsch, Englisch und Arabisch.

Wie darf ich mir das vorstellen? Stiller und friedlicher Protest?

Einer habe sein Handy laden wollen, einer eine Zigarette rauchen und einer den bereits rausgeschmissenen Bewohnenden vor der Tür Zucker für ihren Tee bringen wollen,

Braucht mehr Kontext. Gibts da Rauchverbot? Warum ging das Handy laden nicht? Braucht da unbedingt einer Zucker für den Tee?

Über ein offenes Mikrofon hatten sie Zustände im Camp kritisiert, kaputte Heizungen, mangelnde Hygiene

Davon könnte man z.b. Bilder machen, liebe TAZ.

Sofern es wirklich keine andere Lösung gegeben hätte, als Menschen hinauszuwerfen, hätte den Betroffenen zumindest eine Ersatzunterkunft zugewiesen werden müssen.

Wer betreibt das Ding? Haben die da 24/7 Betreuung und Taxis wenn die eine Einrichtung nicht passt oder wie darf man sich das vorstellen?

Alles was übrig bleibt ist Vermutung und Gerüchte. War die Security rassistisch? Haben sich die Bewohner falsch verhalten? Kann sich jeder aussuchen der den Artikel liest. Für mich ist beides gleichermaßen möglich. Rassistische Security, aber halt auch Fehlverhalten bei den Bewohnern. Geht auch gerne beides.

Kind of.

Mostly yes. As others have written, it involved some money issues. There were also problems with logistics and agriculture, Rome had an absurdly high population for that time. That stuff just has to be managed and managed well.

And also you had some external factors.

And also the religious shift from the old greek gods to christianity, were suddenly a whole bunch of stuff was “against god” the way you would think it is now. It is unclear how much knowledge was lost and exactly why, but the facts remain that you have relatively skilled military doctors in one century and then that disappearing into thin air in the next.

The thing you can observe at the moment, the question of loyalty from universities, into giving positions to loyal or just compliant people over skilled people is roughly the same process. Not the same, because obviously they didn’t have our modern universities, but replace it for any other system of education and actual skill and merit based system and you get the gist of what happened.