• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • I’m all for the theory of the 2A being there to dissuade tyranny. But I was middle school aged when I realized that stopped making sense sometime between 1910 and 1945.

    This government will bomb citizens, given the chance (it wouldn’t even be the 1st or 2nd time they’ve done it). A shotgun won’t help with that in self defense. Nor would it help with the tanks, the jets, the drones, the special ops, the automatic guns, the chemical agents, or any number of classified weapons that would roll over the next most powerful militaries if that’s what they wanted to do.

    I’m not saying don’t get a shotgun. I’m saying, if you really want to prepare to have to exercise your 2A rights, you probably need to be getting something that actually poses a threat to those in power. It probably won’t even be gun shaped, but it will be arms in conflict.


  • I’m glad you enjoyed it.

    I’m putting this down and probably not picking it back up.

    Music is great. Environments great. Love Samus the character.

    UX is terrible. I could write an essay about it, there is no redeeming element. There is no chance anyone with a good taste for UX and influence over the direction of the game actually touched this at any point during development.

    Game formula is dated and anti-fun, I was ok with this major progression tied behind upgrades playing Super Metroid, but useless power-ups dangling behind obvious missing upgrades in your face multiple times during every linear mission is not it in 2026. Combat is boring, IDK who they are trying to appeal to here other than super fans of the Prime series. Maybe the harder difficulty would improve that but I doubt it, and I’ll never find out because you can’t play the harder difficulty before beating the game. Maybe they are appealing to super casuals, it definitely isn’t appealing to kids despite that being the difficulty level of the various gameplay and combat elements.

    The “open world” sand zone is unredeemable. The bike is unredeemable. The fact that we have to suffer through both for so much back tracking is one of the most depressing experiences I’ve had in gaming in 30 years.

    The extra characters only detract from the game, especially the technician guy. If you are intending to play this game despite what you’ve read so far, I suggest you immediately turn the sound level down for voices.

    Ugh



  • leverage@lemdro.idtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksFearless
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve seen one interpretation of our fire code result in each enclosed stall requiring their own flashing light and siren. So the expense to build really does add up. Every contractor knows how to do it the cheap way, anything else they charge a much higher rate to make it worth the trouble. Maybe some shit related to sex or drug use in bathrooms as well, I’d imagine the more secure it feels the more likely someone might see that as a safe thing to try, not saying that’s a real thing but shit gets talked about on the news enough for it to be something the decision maker has in their head to be influenced one way.




  • Unless something about inkjet has improved in the 15 years since I was more inclined to know everything about them, the “goes bad” is what anyone with a brain should be focusing on. The first time you use a cartridge to print, it has a shelf life. It gunks up, prompting cleaning cycles that use dozens of pages worth of ink. If you only print a few pages a month, there’s a good chance you’re getting <40 pages out of that $63 cartridge.

    I have a Brother DCP-7065DN, paid $64 for it in Feb 2014 (obviously a very good deal), page counter reads 3626. We’re on toner #3 including the starter, first was replaced in 2019, second in July 2025. Toner was $55 each.

    I hope there aren’t people seriously advocating for inkjet printers for black and white anything. The only thing they are good for is photos, and even then you are paying more per print for a worse photo vs local print or online order options. That holds true even if you get good deals and somehow actually use the entire cartridge set without waste, I did the math a few times over the years. The only use cases are printing shit you’re too embarrassed to risk printer shop seeing, or is illegal/copyright, or you just like giving money to these garbage companies.

    Maybe projects like this will change the math. I think if they targeted commercial print specifications it would be quite interesting. The jump to larger format printers is so expensive.


  • Ah, thank you and sorry, I should have just searched before posting.

    Part of the issue is the quotes from Facebook rep saying they only do this with public posts, makes me wonder if its user error, platform lying, a bug, etc. but fuck all that. Any situation like this is strictly the platform’s fault, idc if the mother is mistaken and actually posted it publicly, if that’s possible then it’s bad design. Invest more in UX and less in user manipulation. If a parent was intentionally whoring out their children, we’d expect the platform to prevent that, not enable it.


  • I’m not trying to defend Meta, but where in the article does it say that private posts were shared publicly? I’m only seeing that public posts made by adults were used this way. The main rub is Facebook being accused of intentionally serving these publicly posted photos of children in school uniforms (by parents) as bait to join another one of their platforms. Like, a grown man was sent multiple advertisements where this was the exact content, no back to school pictures of young men, or any other type of photo. That they sexualized children algorithmically to bait men into using Threads, and are justifying it’s ok because the parents shared the photo publicly and didn’t opt out of the advertising settings (which seem to be a way to gain followers?).

    One of the men was like, I’ve no idea why they keep sending me these pictures, I don’t engage with them. That might be an even more interesting story, because either Facebook is trying to offer sexualized children to uninterested men, or they know exactly which men are interested in sexualized children and instead of using it to push intervention ads, ban them from seeing the content their AI can definitely classify as enticing, or anything else, they use it to try to make more money.



  • With rare exception, team bonds at big companies are superficial and these forced social situations aren’t going to produce deep bonds.

    More to the point, I have work I actually want to do, and shit like this isn’t going to get it done any faster. Nothing you learn about my dog, kids, the weather, etc is going to make work faster, on the contrary the absolute best case is that we’ll spend more time catching up about non-work shit.

    If management has time to think this stuff is a good idea, they aren’t good managers, especially if they manage anyone that has no interest in these things.

    Feels relevant somehow, consider listening to act one of https://www.thisamericanlife.org/796/what-lies-beneath