Matrix itself isn’t a thing, Matrix is a spec/protocol. Synapse and continuwuity are implementations of the server, with synapse being the “reference implementation.” Client apps like Element (the reference client) would be good to have there, but I’m not sure selfh.st will want to list clients because there is quite a few.
I get the impression they meant AI as in general “Artificial Intelligence”, rather than the buzzword AI used to describe LLMs.
CA unreachable means no renewals, but identity verification (login) is offline. As long as certs renewed fine, connection to the CA is not needed.
Totally worth mentioning, some LG OLED TVs are able to be jailbroken and run homebrew software!
It can block firmware updates and telemetry, so no spying and no surprise “feature” additions.
@[email protected] if it helps, the Symfonium dev is open to de-googled licensing via Ko-Fi donations. See the forum post here: https://support.symfonium.app/t/how-can-i-pay-for-symfonium-without-google-play
Per Tolriq’s responses there, you can get the APK safely from the Aurora Store.
I’m not sure if you’re asking if it is better to use the same password with 2fa, or questioning a claim that it is (which I didn’t see in the article). If it’s the first, no it is not better to re-use a password with 2FA.
2FA is meant to prevent someone from accessing the account if they only have your password. The problem with re-use is they can attempt that same password on other services, which may or may not support 2FA, or may have flaws in their 2FA implementation.
Also, many services will “give away” that the attacker has the right password by reacting differently if they enter the wrong password vs the right one, such as only showing the 2FA prompt if they have the right password.
Using unique passwords AND 2FA is far better, as it means an attacker must start from scratch for every service they wish to attack, and still requires compromise of your 2FA device in addition to finding out your password.