

This is the world most of us want to live in I would think.
He is not the one to deliver it. He doesn’t really want that. If he did, he wouldn’t want $1t let alone fight to get it. Let alone all the other vile shit he has done, and will do.
I’m the administrator of kbin.life, a general purpose/tech orientated kbin instance.


This is the world most of us want to live in I would think.
He is not the one to deliver it. He doesn’t really want that. If he did, he wouldn’t want $1t let alone fight to get it. Let alone all the other vile shit he has done, and will do.
Of course not. As the merovingian in the matrix says. French is a fantastic language, especially to curse with.


Ahh so a trojan horse. Inside is a klingon bird of prey?


So far I’ve mostly avoided the whole “things that don’t need to be on the Internet” situation.
Non smart TV (well that period when they started adding smart features but they’re all out of date now so not even connected to the Internet)
All kitchen stuff is just kitchen stuff. No Internet.
Car is still offline.
Only real exception is smart thermostat, and that’s just because when the boiler was installed that’s what they put in.
Now, and yet also at any point in history, and also likely the future.
The annoying thing is, the partner they use accept credit card as a method of verification. I suppose they cannot justify access your saved card details for this purpose. But technically the info is there, yes.


OK. +1. -1000. They’re clawing it back! :P


It’s interesting for everyone, but if the split is US news and World news, this is a US centric story. All of the players are US based. Like I say, the subreddit’s the naming convention these communities are based on had very much a “US” goes in news and “RoW” goes into WorldNews ethos.
I don’t see policies stating that here. So I think it’s a very different situation to the other place (and we can argue about why there’s two news communities, but that’s another story). But, I was just wondering if the moderation was done in the same vain.


I wonder if not allowing this on world news is a leftover from the reddit split between news/worldnews. In the rules here I cannot see anything that says news = US news. But on reddit the news sub DID have that rule. They would delete any non-us story.
As such worldnews was for all non-US news and in that case deleting this very US centric topic would be fair game.
There isn’t that clear cut difference between news/worldnews on the fediverse. It looks like the two communities were created to mirror reddit. But, the rules don’t align.
Also, even as a non American. I knew it would be OAN.
I note they make an exemption for the UK. Now, while the UK is no longer part of the EU we do have a version of the GDPR which includes the right of erasure and follows similar rules to the EU GDPR. And is pretty close to “The right to be forgotten”. The ICO site about it even references that phrase.
So, I wonder why they think they get to treat us differently. I suspect I know. There are exemptions they can claim to the right of erasure (and I bet they’re similar in the EU GDPR). But here’s the difference. The UK ICO is a toothless useless organisation they know very well they can either exploit or ignore.
Then I suggest they use an XNOR pointer instead! Checkmate patent trolls!
Regret is such a long word, when I’m so, so tired.


Or, you do the tutorial, play for an hour don’t come back for a year and don’t know what is going on.


Well I’d also be very weary of getting that close to the sun too.
Huh. I am sure you could search for individual books. For sure you could do it by goodreads ID I think? Yes, adding an entire author as the primary way to do things is a bit much for some. I know for sure I have managed to do individual books before now.


Well it is. If you get fined £50 a day for leaving your car parked in a no parking zone. And you get a notice your parking is being investigated. Do you a) Move your car to mean you “at worst” get the fine for the time you were there or b) Just leave it there, because “they’ve already got me”?
Just because there’s a POTENTIAL for some comeback from prior infringements, doesn’t mean a good financial decision isn’t to pull out of the market to avoid future infringement actions. This is ESPECIALLY so, when there’s a new law with stricter enforcement available to the state regulator.
My whole point has been from the start “Just trying to avoid being fined” is a financial business decision. They have multiple options. But the ones that matter are:
One carries less financial risk than the other. They chose the option with lower financial risk to them.
I’m from the UK and it’s not a great situation for us. But, I also think businesses that have a genuine fear of ending up in Ofcom’s sights need to start making this kind of decision to the extent that normal people begin to feel the effect of the Online Safety act. Because that’s the only time they’re going to get the kind of backlash they need to respond to.


But, that’s still the same thing. It’s a commercial decision to withdraw from the market rather than fight a legal battle. It’s entirely based on financial risk.
Like I say, the ICO and Ofcom are letting that fact pull a lot more weight than it should. But it’s technically a correct assessment.
Yep, same. Well I actually remember finding the best ways to copy a game on a tape error free first. Some, without protection you could just save back to tape for a digital reproduction (and this also allowed tape to disk conversion). Actually those with non destructive copy protection could kinda be copied too if you knew a little Z80 ASM. Others, you needed to copy tape to tape and hope the quality turned out OK.
But yes, then bringing your box of copied disks (Amiga in my case) into school and swapping with your friends was the way to go.


Which whether you like it or not, is a commercial decision. They cannot realistically vet people for age, because 99% of requests are unauthenticated. Who is going to make an imgur account just so they can see imgur images?
So they made the commercial choice to avoid losing money through fines vs whatever revenue (ad based? I don’t know their model) they would earn from UK users.
Now, ICO and Ofcom have their own reasons to play it down in this way. But, they’re also technically correct.
Thanks AI. Remind me how many megawatt hours your model consumed to create?