I mean does it even look like creators are aiming to produce child like appearance? Full sized products would be more expensive to create and ship, and for customers - to buy and store.

You can easily buy a compact silicone alternative with human body features and… you’d be called a mutilation maniac?

Is there actual correlation between buyers of such products and real child abusers?

I would like it to be worth of the watch. But from what I remember, deep strikes by Ukraine started to affect Russia during 2024, so I assume the stage of the war the video tells us about lasts for over a year already. I can only categorize this as a low effor content and can’t recommend it to anyone.

The video tells a lot of words but literally nothing specific. It seems like the text was generated by an AI with a short prompt like “Ukraine is starting to hit targets deep inside Russia” - there is literally nothing else you hear in this video. When? Where? Why exactly it makes the difference right now? Who cares right?

Not all web apps are overengineered crap

I didn’t say that. There are always well engineered apps and things. But few. Compared to that, a lot of mainstream desktop apps are now web apps for no good reason. The actual reason is webdevs not challenging themselves to become something else or at least better.

If I read your case correctly, it’s basically “customers use crappy laptops -> we decided to make them use web browsers” which sounds insane to me because web content IS the reason why tons of otherwise unnecessary upgrades are done in recent 10 years or so. Office guys can’t use Chrome with just 8 GB of RAM because it will affect their business performance.

Not that I don’t believe your case doesn’t contain other specifics that make web a right choice. And I don’t need to know more of that. It’s just how it sounded to me.

Not desktop. Native. You can build native apps for smartphones and pretty much anything. Web comes into play when you decide you won’t build native version of what you want. In some cases that is guided by thoughts like “I know web will fit this project. I know the platform and will remember to keep memory and internet usage low”, but in most cases it’s about “no idea what that startup is about, but I know some AngularJS and they said I can use AWS so that’ll do”.

Similar thing is happening now with Unreal Engine 5. The difference between devs and webdevs became very similar to the difference between coding and vibe coding.

and doesn’t need to store a ton of data

I know by data you mean “data I care about as a dev” but that should also include data that is actually processed and saved on user’s device. And webapps are notoriously bad at keeping their caches and data usage low.

It just so happens that overwhelming amount of them do what they should not do - create actual apps (webapps in reality). We could thank Google or frameworks for this, but ultimately their incompetence leads to situations like this. Webdevs thinking of everything as a platform for their stuff that should be working at all times. If they were actual devs they would build proper native apps, think more about how devices actually supposed to work, and rely on cloud less.

It means Epic wants more users to play Fortnite, whatever Fortnite is. They could rename Unreal Engine into Fortnite at some point probably.

Because we have webdevs and think of them as devs. They are not devs. They are mostly idiots.

Alexei Navalny, who was Putin’s late main opponent, was also approving of annexing Crimea and hinted at being approving of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

That’s a series of misunderstandings and thesises by Russian propaganda. In the end, he didn’t approve of annexation and invasions. From what I remember he only hinted at the difficulty of solving the issue of Crimea in future. Even if you find specific posts or reactions from him that suggest supporting what Russia did, they are not explained enough to be sure and those interpretations have been denied by himself in later interviews and posts.

I’ve listened to him for years. I believe that it’s impossible for him to approve Russian expansion already because of what he consistently suggested: Russia needs to think of its problems within first, and when it comes to international relations it should be good friends with Europe. In no universe he could think that violent invasions or annexations or wars would contribute to that. And I don’t find him to be any kind of supremacist. He explained a lot of issues with Russia and wanted to solve them.

Unfortunately that seems to be an AI slop.

Time to feed my babies.
https://youtu.be/1KIKrSG-Xzc

deleted by creator

I hate software that doesn’t support Unicode, and it’s also not difficult to implement. At one point I wrote a dll that hacked a way how one app was handling filenames, to force it to use CreateFileW instead of CreateFileA. Just that allowed it to support Unicode filenames basically.

That’s a neat way to miss the good point about server side solutions. Which would be the absence of intrusive client side code.

You developed software and games? Well I cracked them haha. Have fun detecting puny exploits like 3rd party processes. Moving data our of PC because it could be stolen by cheaters or kernel level something? That’s where your acceptance of all of this have led you.

Any server-side anti-cheat really. You might argue they don’t exist but that’s the whole point. They will become effective once they start to develop, and maybe we are actually seeing that now.

Didn’t read past first sentence. Don’t want to waste my time with a kernel level anti-cheat fan.

Counter (simplier) hypothesis: people who don’t care about how they negatively impact other people’s experience are overall scumbags.

https://playvalorant.com/

That source is biased. However looking at their ban types, behavior type is less than 5% probably. I’d imagine it should’ve been majority for an anti-cheat that works well.

Please provide factual evidence, not hearsay. That’s % cheaters detected vs % cheaters not detected scaled by the overall player base.

Yeah good luck providing such evidence for any kind of game or anti-cheat.

Personally, I hate kernel level ac and it made me actually stop playing few games and avoid similar ones. Had enough of mere games screwing up with my PC through EAC and EAC ignoring my reports for years.

Nintendo is no worse than Microsoft, Sony, Steam, I could go on and on.

But that statement is incorrect. Nintendo does too much to harm game preservation, much more than any other company.