here’s a higher quality article from the person that discovered it

07

Here’s the actual article

Every day we stray deeper into the cool zone

dead at 84

jesus…. he was just a kid

How do you unwatch a video

Edit: the fuck is a razzler(don’t answer that)

lol we’re going full ancap now

That was for October 15th the next paycheck is the 30th or something and it sounds like they don’t have the money barring an 11th hour discovery

Edit: didn’t catch the news that some anonymous billionaire(drug money?) did a super chat for the paychecks but 130 mil will just be a partial paycheck that’s not enough but I’m sure they’re gonna keep raiding the couch cushions lmao

If they’re really committing to regime change in Venezuela the shutdown is not going to last much longer . It’s likely it will end with the 60 vote threshold being bypassed they will end the shutdown with a simple majority. Or trump will throw Schumer a bone and the dems will just let this happen

always pay your guys

Jesus Christ I guess it’s gonna be decades again

Except the Hasan stuff was essentially a narrative that was made up out of thin air whereas with this there’s actually something to it.

It’s really hard to understand where people are coming from with this perspective that those of us expressing skepticism about this guy are seeking out “perfection” like Hasan and Zohran have flaws especially the latter but I’m willing to except the possibility that good can come from them.

This is something else entirely it’s not purity politics . So there’s bad faith actors tarring him? I don’t care about the source I don’t feel comfortable getting behind a guy who patrolled abu ghraib and I don’t want the ADL to have an easy W by having a new anti Zionist senator have a Nazi tattoo.

Yes you can dig up dirt on anyone and technology can make that easier but that doesn’t mean we have to get behind this one like cmon now

Or we could just find someone good to run who isn’t a mercenary and doesn’t have Nazi tattoos. The election is in a year there’s time to do that.

Crazy idea I know

sounds about right democrat

One thing I’ve learned about California politics is that newsom has frequently vetoed bills that passed with an OVERWHELMING majority in the state senate/assembly and the legislature typically has significantly more than enough votes to override his vetoes.

So why don’t they do it? Literally because of precedent. They don’t do it because that’s just the way it has always been done and they’re afraid to veto because they don’t want to make the governor look bad.

Elected representatives will go as far as criticizing the governor for his vetoes but they refuse to ever do anything about it

Reading about this stuff is going to make me die of cringe so I think I will simply stop

Wikipedia lumping all these together as being a part of “the Gen Z protest movement” is the dumbest shit but it’s also hilarious because it’s pretty clear the consent manufacturing machine that came up with this moniker doesn’t actually support all of these and are probably mad that the strikes for Gaza in Italy and elsewhere are being described as Gen Z protests

The whole narrative surrounding this is bizarre and incoherent…. Young people are protesting? That in of itself is not novel and deserving of a label and this will only get more weird when Wikipedia is forced to contend with the fact that basically any protest that involves young people is going to be called a Gen Z protest by a “reliable source” that isn’t deeply integrated into the consent manufacturing machine such as the nytimes which only describe protests as Gen Z protests if it aligns with US interests.

Because we are being told that this is all innocuous it’s just about young people it will inevitably just be applied to anything and as mass media picks and chooses what does and does not constitute a Gen Z protest the people buying into this bullshit will have to increasingly jump through more and more hoops to justify why any of this even makes sense.

I think it speaks to how lazy the people pushing this stuff have gotten since the effort required is so small compared to back in the day you just have to game the algorithms and get your hashtags out there until western media starts running with the narrative.

Pretty sure a lot of Forbes articles aren’t even written by “journalists” actually employed by Forbes i think they contract that shit out pay per article/amount of views

Edit: seems to be confirmed by others in the comments

Trump is forbidden from mid 2010s Reddit heaven

lfg Hadash the only good political party in the occupations political assembly known as the “Knesset”