• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年7月1日

help-circle



  • The good, the bad, and the dick

    Dicks from the crypt

    Back to the dick

    Inside Dick

    The Italian dick

    Dicks of the universe

    Kong: Dick Island

    Revenge of the Dicks

    Dick at a funeral

    Black Dick Down

    Dick Express

    Dick Royale

    How to be a Latin dick

    Toy Dicks

    Top Dick

    The Naked Dick

    Lord of the Dicks

    Three Dicks

    Dude, where is my dick?

    Indiana Jones and the temple of Dick











  • It seems overconfidence in the output, laziness, underconfidence in writing things themselves, and offloading responsibility of thought are a few of the many reasons that come to mind. There is a minority of people who achieve better results and after gaining expertise in prompting using AI and give false hopes to the rest. Then there are the loud tech executives who promote AI with the help of amplifying media.

    There is also the fact that you can quickly generate images and videos which a normal person without the proper tools and photoshop/photography knowledge would not be able to easily achieve.

    I have had to spend time re-engineering AI output code. I know I’m not an expert but the output and time it takes to write long, prompts with sufficient context and detail is not trivial. A single prompt is not sufficient. Better outputs are achieved through several structured prompts for every “job” in a “team” needed to achieve the outcome (product owner, project manager, software engineer, quality engineer, UI engineer, etc). for writing articles or a book, I would expect a similar set pattern to achieve better results.

    And then there is the whole thing about “hallucinations” which undermines quality.