turdcollector69

Everyone knows bacon isn’t good for you, nitrates aside the saturated fats are horrendous for you.

If you’re eating bacon you’re already doing it knowing it’s bad for you.

We should save the prop65 warnings for things that actually need it. They’re already way oversaturated and have lost all meaning to the vast, vast majority of consumers.

We may as well flatten the whole planet to eliminate the risk of falling down stairs.

I hate how far people go to safety pad the whole planet when an ounce of personality responsibility is all that’s needed.

I never said they weren’t in the same category. To act like implying the risks of nitrates are identical to asbestos is insane and just makes people ignore these warnings.

There is a need to differentiate the level of risk because if you don’t people are going to think the 10,000kg bomb is the same danger as a Glock when in reality they abso-fucking-lutely not.

It’s disingenuous, you’re right that context matters because displaying the two as if they’re the same strips the risk assessment of its context.

It’s pointless because California standards are so stringent that literally everything has a prop 65 warning on it.

It’s completely lost all value or meaning to end consumers.

Putting nitrates in the same category as fucking asbestos is literally insane.

It’s like putting a Glock and a 10,000kg bomb in the same category, it’s utterly disingenuous.

That’s forever in Planck time

You speak as if all Americans are the same like a hive mind.

Ironically using such sweeping generalities makes you more aligned with the administration taking away our freedoms.

It makes me so mad because AOC is exactly the kind of candidate that Kamala tried to cosplay as for her campaign.

It’s so frustrating to see people drool over the fake as fuck version of AOC yet say AOC isn’t presidential material.

Oh hell yeah I’m making this but without the nuts for allergy reasons.

I never cared for Cowboy Bebop.

It insists upon itself

Based behavior, they do it for the love of the game and being correct in online arguments.

They always say shit like “at least I don’t hit her” or “at least I’m not an alcoholic” while missing that those qualities are a given.

I think it’s a form of narcissism where they can’t handle that their personality is shitty so they project it into the world. They have to use outlandish examples because they’re not such hot catches themselves.

I mean with LLM’s it’s not hard to have an arbitrary amount of bots posing as users pushing a false consensus on political issues.

It’s even easier when the bot accounts are used to falsify advertising data.

I have no love for tankies. It just seemed like a lot of effort and mental energy went into that so I thought there may be some interesting lore there.

They’re starting to erase the supposed tenants of conservative values, worshipping Regan and small government.

The small government stuff was always bullshit but until now he’s been able/forced to hide behind Regan conservatives. Now he’s conflicting with their jesus and doing it in a very overt way.

I do think attacks like this are highly effective because it forces their cognitive dissonance into scrutiny and it’s another chip in the brainwashing.

Many can be swayed like this though anyone who’s made it their identity is too far gone because they won’t accept logical arguments.

Why do you care about tankies so much?

You can just let people be wrong. It costs nothing.

They’re obviously hardliners to the point of comedic effect but why do you care so much to argue?

Do you really expect someone who’s so set in their opinions as to join .ml to read your comment and just go, “oh damn, guess I’ll just stop believing in the things I believe in and believe in entirely different things”?

Do you genuinely think you’re so convincing or do you just enjoy a good pissing contest?

Stored separately for left overs. I won’t stand for soggy rice

No, but now I’ve got fomo about this. What exactly am I missing out on here? What should I look up recipes for or order?

Cornmeal is for seafood and okra. I am fully willing and committed to dying on this hill.

I never had the hooters experience, I had more of a “self-imposed secret conversation therapy” and being bi certainly helped to pass.

Lifelong identity issues and anxiety are worth it to avoid the travesty of cornmeal on chicken imo.

You really should learn more about drugs before you start throwing terminology around.

Weed doesn’t really fit the upper/downer dichotomy because cofactors like the various terpenes and cannabinoids other than THC.

It can have both stimulant and system depressant effects.

Unlike opium, marijuana usage has not been linked with overdose and isn’t anywhere near as addictive.

Thc has been implicated in exacerbating mental health issues like schizophrenia but it has not been linked with direct physical damage to our bodies. Besides smoking which obviously always carries a risk.

Regardless, your opium hyperbole is like comparing caffeine to meth amphetamine. It’s utterly ridiculous to anyone with any knowledge on the subject.