One of the funniest kinds of Stan Kelly comic is when he’s occasionally right.
I love it when I look up one of his references and learn that it’s even more appropriate than I expected:
The Spuds McKenzie ad campaign was not without its share of controversy. Shortly after Spuds’ rise to fame, it was learned that the dog, portrayed as male in the ads, was actually female. Politicians and advocacy groups criticized the ads for promoting consumption of alcohol by children. Soon after the ads first aired in 1987, Senator Strom Thurmond began his own media campaign, claiming that the beer maker was using Spuds to appeal to children in order to get them interested in their product at an early age. By Christmas 1987, more legal action resulted from Bud Light’s use of ads featuring Spuds dressed as Santa. Advertisements for alcohol beverages cannot reference Santa Claus in states such as Ohio.
I remember when I found out that Suds McDuff from The Simpsons and Slurms McKenzie from Futurama were both referencing a real mascot

deleted by creator
He drew the phones properly and didn’t label them as ”some gizmo”

Didn’t even give us a “*latest fad”
I went to nerd school. We had both types there and it did not correlate with grades.
I mean they dont even delay the start of classes anymore
Back in the day I had a friend who got so hammered the night before his classes started that he dropped all of them around 3:00 a.m. and added them back after his hangover ended, so it wouldn’t count as an absence.
This is a very important matter for Kelly:
Livers/livers







